Skip to main content

Special Meeting 9/3/2021

 

 

 Special Council Meeting

After months of negotiations and countless hours of research, debate, arguing, public hearings, reviews of 1000s of pages of plans and agreements, etc., tonight (9/3/21) we held a special council meeting to discuss and vote on two major neighborhoods of the Old Farm Estates (OFE) development.

Versions of the two neighborhoods, the Peregrine Townhomes and the Teton Heights Apartments, had been approved already. But both the city and the developers agreed that we could come up with a better plan for both of these neighborhoods.

For the city, it was a proactive chance to negotiate a much better final result than we were slated to get otherwise. The council asked final questions this evening of the city staff, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the developers.

Based on their recommendations and the council members own due diligence, the council vote unanimously to approved the new plans for these two neighborhoods. Given the options on the table, I can't imagine anyone with the city's best interest in mind voting not to approve the new plans and instead sticking with what was currently approved.

Now, I should mention some of the concerns that are being expressed by some residents regarding the meeting.

  • The meeting was not an emergency meeting; it was a special meeting held to address these particular issues. The meeting was announced and posted publicly as required. There are such things as emergency council meetings that don't follow standard public announcement procedures, but this wasn't one of those. (I might add that I'm not a fan of meetings outside of the normally scheduled meetings. I'm very sympathetic to this concern. In this case, we thought it was best for all parties involved to make a decision on these proposals--one way or another--sooner rather than later. If we decided we wanted to approve, now was the time for the agreement to be made. If we decided we didn't want to approve, the land owners deserved to know, as ground was ready to be broken on the already previously approved developments.)
  • The meeting was held on the high school homecoming football game night. That was not on purpose. No deception or subterfuge was intended as far as I know. We simply didn't check the school district calendar. Though some city business can't be adjusted just because it interferes with the school district's calendar, I will try to take such things into account better in the future.
  • There were no public comments allowed during the meeting. That is true. As this was a judgement being made on items on which there had already been a public hearing and a findings of facts by the P&Z, there was not additional direct public comment allowed on the items. We try to keep the meetings and the process as open and transparent as possible, but such are the necessary yet often frustrating constraints of code and law.
  • Council members have access to the public comments made during P&Z public hearings, even though we aren't allowed to participate in the hearings themselves. I think it's clear that many residents are very concerned about zoning, density and housing types. I think the mayor, the city staff, the P&Z Commission, and the council are all aware of this and are in the process of addressing these concerns when it comes to future development in the city. Please keep your eyes open for more on this in the meetings to come. And if you are really interested, please drop in city hall and ask about serving on the P&Z Commission or one of the other city's committees. We need more participation.

Well, I expect growth in Sugar City is bound to be the major issue before us for years to come. I hope we all can remain pleasant neighbors regardless of our opinions on the issues that arise. In the end, it is the love and concern and respect we have for one another that creates a great place to live. And Sugar City is a great place to live.

Popular posts from this blog

Railroad Ave Project; Fiber Project; Public Notification; Sugar Salem Moody Cemetery; Sugar Days

  Railroad Ave Project Back in 2018, the city approved a project to improve the safety and usability of Railroad Ave as it comes into town from the south. The engineering was completed, and the project was ready to go. For various reasons, there was no funding at the time, so the project has been on hold since then. Recently the city was awarded a grant that will cover the entire cost of the project--something that rarely happens. The map above shows the plans. The redesign will allow for a much better and safer flow of traffic in and out of Sugar City, especially for the truck traffic from Sun-Glo and Dickinson Foods. The traffic in the area will be rerouted as necessary during the project, with as little inconvenience as possible. Please be on the look out for notices and signs about the project, as it should be starting soon. Fiber Project The project to install fiber in the older areas of the city as part of the Fybercom & Madison County & Sugar City agreement is underw...
Read more

City Impact Area: County Decision

  Impact Area A city is required to have an impact area surrounding the city's boundaries within the unincorporated county. The impact area allows the county, city, and property owners to plan for possible or probable land development.  Residents of the impact area are not in the city limits, but they can have the benefit of having a proportional number of impact area residents serving on the city's planning and zoning commission, giving them a voice in any future development. Any landowner who wishes to develop their property within the impact area deals with the county as usual; however, as we strive to consolidate development--saving, as we can, more farm and other ag and open land--the land owner is required to follow the basic development ordinances laid out in the city code with the intent that the land being developed in the impact area will eventually become part of the city (annexation). One of the main issues with county land development is water protection and water...
Read more

2025 Budget; Utility Fees; Sugar City's First Stoplight?; Construction Updates

  2025 Budget Last council meeting, the city council passed the 2025 budget. This is a summary of the budget. If you'd like to see more details, please stop by city hall and ask to see it. We also heard from the city auditors regarding our finances from the past year, and we got a good report. You can also see a copy of that report at city hall if you wish.  The city runs on public funding, and I think the current budget reflects this understanding--that we have to be wise in what we budget for and how we plan for current and future city needs. Cities have to be careful not to get into the habit of thinking "We need more money," and, instead, be in the habit of thinking "We can make this work." Utility Fees Here are the new fees for water, sewer, and garbage. "Last Year" = 2024 budget; "This Year" = 2025 budget (beginning Oct 1, 2024) Sugar City's First Stoplight? Councilmember Carter Stanford pointed out that the new stoplight on the nor...
Read more